Building The New Digital Experience With AI Starts With Engineering Quality Into It

Asad Khan is the Co-Founder & CEO of TestMu AI, an AI-native unified enterprise test execution cloud platform.

getty​Walk into any product team building a digital experience today, and the work looks nothing like it did five years ago.

I have spent the last decade building testing infrastructure, and in that time I have watched billions of test runs flow through our platform, which gives me a vantage point on how software quality actually behaves at scale.

What I see right now is a line the industry has crossed that most quality strategies have not caught up with. Building a digital experience today means assembling a system of models, agents and generated code.

The teams doing it well have learned that quality has to be engineered into that system from the first architecture decision, because there is no practical way to bolt it on at the end.

Web apps that once took a quarter now go from prompt to production in weeks. AI agents write the frontend, generate the mobile flows and scaffold the backend, and product teams that never wrote code are shipping working software.

On top of those AI-built experiences, companies are deploying AI agents as the experience itself, handling support conversations and guiding purchases on the user’s behalf.

The industry has already committed to this at scale. LangChain’s 2026 State of AI Agents report found 57% of organizations have agents running in production, and 32% name quality as the single biggest barrier to deploying more.

Both layers of this new stack resist the old testing playbook at once. Generated code arrives at a pace no review process was sized for, and conversational experiences can answer the same question ten valid ways, leaving a scripted assertion with nothing meaningful to verify.

This is why quality belongs in the architecture conversation.

To close this gap, teams have to stop treating quality as a single activity and rebuild it as layers, matching the layers of the new stack itself. ​

Quality for an AI experience gets decided before any code exists, when the team writes down what acceptable behavior actually means: the boundaries a response must stay inside, the commitments the system is allowed to make, and the point at which it must hand off to a human.

Every downstream test is only as good as the definition it checks against, and in my experience, the AI features that fail in production are usually the ones that were never given one.

Coding agents generate features fast, but the agent writing the code should never be the only judge of whether it works.

The pattern I now recommend is an independent CLI QA agent running in the same terminal, driving end-to-end flows against the local build from natural-language commands before anything merges.

A developer can prompt a feature into existence and prompt its verification in the same sitting, while the context is still on screen.

​The difference between this and a general-purpose coding assistant asked to write tests is precision and repeatability, because a QA agent built specifically for quality runs the same validation identically every time, at whatever scale the release demands, on infrastructure designed for exactly that job.

When an agent handles the entire cycle this way, the hours engineers once spent scripting, maintaining and debugging tests come back to the team.

One fintech platform achieved a 35% increase in productive engineering throughput in QA with a purpose-built QA agent, while cutting test execution time by 60% and reclaiming 600-plus engineering hours every month.

An experience that works on a flagship phone over office Wi-Fi and stumbles on a mid-range device over a patchy network is, for many users, simply broken.

Validation belongs on real browsers, real devices and real network conditions rather than emulators, because customers experience the product through hardware and connectivity the team never chose.

The newest layer covers the AI agents deployed on top of those web and mobile builds, which engage customers in ways no scripted test anticipates, switching intent mid-conversation, interrupting, rephrasing and responding emotionally.

Models, prompts and data keep shifting after launch, so the same quality dimensions tested pre-release need to keep flowing as live signals, with answer accuracy and escalation spikes sampled from real interactions.

Every failure observability catch should then become a permanent test scenario, so the suite compounds with each release until it reflects what actually breaks rather than upfront guesses.

In a system where AI writes the code, assembles the interface and runs the interactions, quality stops being a phase and becomes a design decision made alongside the architecture.

Estimate how many experience variants a user could encounter in your most AI-mediated journey, then count how many your plan would ever exercise. The distance between those numbers is your true quality posture, and closing it deserves the same rigor as the build itself.​

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?