Doctor Khongkwan Files Complaint Against Boom Panadda Over Charity Donation Dispute, Insisting She Is Not a Victim but a Wrongdoer Who Must Face Consequences

Direct Source Verification: This story is aggregated from Thairath (thairath.co.th). Full reporting rights and copyright belong to the primary publisher.
Doctor Khongkwan Files Complaint Against Boom Panadda Over Charity Donation Dispute, Insisting She Is Not a Victim but a Wrongdoer Who Must Face Consequences  www.thairath.co.th

On the morning of 5 Nov 2026 GMT+7, Doctor Khongkwan Fujitiniran, a well-known social media figure, went to the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) to file a complaint regarding Boom Panadda Wongpudi and the issue of donation funds to the Good Deeds Foundation. Doctor Khongkwan had donated 100,000 baht and also spoke to the media about this complaint.

Are you here to file a complaint today?

Doctor Khongkwan: Yes, today I am filing a complaint against Boom Panadda. Honestly, I hadn’t planned to do this, but this morning I spoke with P'Num Kanchai and several others. I have to say, many around me—friends, loved ones, people who trusted P'Boom—are heartbroken and crying.

This morning I talked with P'Num Kanchai, and he said he’s also under attack, being criticized for not supporting someone who’s fallen. So we agreed: if someone needs a spokesperson, I’ll step up.

Because truly, one should not abandon a person who’s fallen... but here we’re talking about a “thief in the guise of a saint” who betrayed the trust of the entire nation. The world has turned upside down; now some sympathize with the thief and blame the victim.

Who is the victim? The victims are all Thai people who donated with pure hearts, or those close to her who trusted her deeply, helping to share the bank account number to gather donations, or those who worked hard like Sarapuk—the admins who didn’t sleep, coordinating flood relief and medical supplies. Even KKC sent medical supplies during floods countless times.

It’s heartbreaking to see donated items being discarded instead of used for intended aid. Yet some sympathize with... no, that’s wrong. People who fall should not be ignored, but here the victims are being further hurt. This is madness.

I feel those who say this should reconsider and open their eyes to the facts. Zombie fans must stop fantasizing and look at reality: the real fans are those close to her—friends, siblings, true confidants who talk all day, coordinate efforts, donate money, trust her until the last moment, and now sit crying at home with broken hearts. Those are her true fans, not the ones saying “Oh, don’t abandon someone who’s fallen, why attack them to death?” Stop this nonsense. Honestly, this is foolishness.

Because sympathy should be for those who make mistakes but are willing to improve. It doesn’t apply to thieves who planned deception from day one.

Imagine a poor person with 100 baht, donating 50 baht to charity and keeping 50 baht for instant noodles. They hope their money helps those in need through someone they trust as a bridge of merit. Should anyone misuse that money for personal luxury, husbands, family, buying gold or designer bags? The gossip about luxury brands and cars is rampant—I’ll share more offline later.

Should we stand with people like that? If you want to stand with such people, I suggest building a house near Bang Kwang Prison and stand with them there, because in 10 to 15 days more self-styled philanthropists like this will appear. This has been the pattern in Thailand for a long time. Why?

Charity is good, but it should be a small cog helping the larger system work properly. It should never be the main pillar of Thailand. Thailand is a kind-hearted country, quick and generous with transfers, but why? Because it’s a failure of government to assist.

I still stand by my statement: “Charity is the failure of government responsibilities.” Assistance should be timely, ideally government’s duty, and foundations should intervene only to prevent incidents like this from happening again.

I want to emphasize that I speak for many people. When asked if I’m angry, no—I’m channeling the anger of others accumulated over four full days, since those who want to speak out can’t.

To Boom, if you’re watching: many people, including your close friends, people in the entertainment industry, actors, and those who work closely with you, ask, “What kind of person uses loved ones—even family and children—as human shields to protect themselves, knowing fully well what they’ve done?” You even involved little Anda to hold a press conference—how will she live after this?

We must separate these things. Now the attacks are targeting Anda, a young girl who has lived well and knows nothing, with no choice. We must distinguish this—attacking Anda, a child in her early teens, is unacceptable.

Before Doctor Khongkwan’s recent live broadcast, she questioned Boom and suggested Boom take care of herself. Did you speak to Boom after that?

Doctor Khongkwan: Yes, we talked once. But now, 24 hours after the issue exploded following P'Num Kanchai’s meeting with police and revealing evidence, Boom no longer reads messages or answers calls from close people. Earlier, when Sarapuk went live and Boom commented “Doctor, can we talk?” she called me. We talked and I still had confidence until the last moment, sharing the burden together. But if you realize it’s harmful, you should spit it out—there are plenty of other good things.

I believed until the last moment that she was deceived. But with the evidence P'Num shared, and confirming with him “Are you sure?” and he said “A million percent.” That was final. I can no longer support her.

When I first asked about the money, if it was kept or secured, Boom said she was disappointed that I didn’t understand a woman’s feelings. What about now?

Doctor Khongkwan: I don’t understand what she meant by “not understanding a woman’s feelings.” I am a businesswoman; it’s normal to have cash in a safe. But it’s strange for someone running a foundation.

We simply raised a question after seeing news about Bennett soap. I want Bennett to clarify how much money was given to Boom. The explanation was the cash was a lucky money gift for a child, totaling 7 million baht for auspicious reasons.

But according to the news, for baby Alex’s birth, 1 million was given, also for Alex and Anda combined 1 million. For baby Arthur, there was no news about the amount.

If this money wasn’t lucky money, why keep it in cash? Even if we take a rosy view—that the banknotes were to welcome a new grandchild—doctors who deliver babies usually get millions in gifts, all deposited in banks. Why would someone keep so much in cash? When I raised these questions, I was heavily criticized online, accused of being disloyal. Well, we live and work together.

Have you talked to Sarapuk about her mental state?

Doctor Khongkwan: Oh, about half of what Sarapuk said (laughs). She is very distressed and still crying—she was crying until 9:30 a.m. while we talked in the car.

Besides the money transfer slips presented as evidence to police today, is there other evidence, like lists of donated items?

Doctor Khongkwan: Oh, that kind of evidence isn’t tangible. The coordinators were like, “Do you want this?” and we’d send it by phone message. But then we saw pictures of donated goods—dog food, cat food, food, water, medicine, diapers—all piled up and discarded. It’s like “I don’t want the goods, I only want money.” It’s terribly cruel.

Some say charity and sin should be separated, that doing good is good. I say: “No good person has a foundation built on deceit.” If doing good means helping flood victims, I could do that too if given 800 million baht; I’d do it every day.

Did you deliberate long before deciding to file today?

Doctor Khongkwan: I spoke with P'Num at 8 a.m., 9 a.m., and at 10 a.m. I said okay, I’ll file a complaint. I want famous people or former friends of hers to have the courage to come forward and file complaints.

And to those saying “Oh, she’s fallen, just leave her be”—that’s foolishness, to be blunt. P'Num will likely file a complaint soon as well.

What do you expect to happen with Boom after this complaint?

Doctor Khongkwan: At least I’m doing what I can. From 10 to 100, 100 to 1,000, 1,000 to 10,000. If they say Boom is innocent until proven guilty, let’s help the court decide more easily.

Lawyer Tum says an arrest warrant will likely be issued soon. How do you feel about that?

Doctor Khongkwan: Everyone must face what they do. Karma always acts; no one is above it. So everyone must accept their actions. Personally, I have no personal grudge. I’ve spoken to her fewer than three times in my life.

Doctor Khongkwan: Oh, Sarapuk is abroad. She did not give power of attorney. I don’t know. She’s overseas.

Original Source
https://en.thairath.co.th/entertain/news/2970598
Visit Thairath ↗
SHARE STORY:
𝕏 f in

Related Coverage in Health