Five accused in Armstrong murder case granted bail

You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

Five persons accused in the murder of Bahujan Samaj Party leader K. Armstrong have been granted mandatory bail on the ground that the Central Bureau of Investigation is yet to file a final report, while they have been in prison for more than two years without the trial commencing.

Sources said almost all those arrested and remanded in connection with the case have now been enlarged on bail.

On the evening of July 5, 2024, Armstrong was hacked to death by a gang of nine members. Armstrong was rushed to Apollo Hospital, Greams Road, but died on the way.

Based on a complaint, the Sembium police registered a case and formed special teams. The suspects were arrested in quick succession. A total of 30 people, including three women, were cited as accused. Gangsters Nagendran and Sambav Senthil were among them. Nagendran later died of ill health, while another accused, Thiruvenkadam, was killed in an encounter. Sambav Senthil and his associate Mottai Krishnan remain absconding.

On September 24, 2025, the Madras High Court quashed the charge sheet filed by the Sembium police and transferred the investigation to the CBI, citing concerns over the thoroughness and impartiality of the State police probe. The State government later withdrew its challenge before the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, more than 15 accused, including Aswathaman, were enlarged on bail. The CBI took over the case and re-registered it as R.C. No. 09/S/2026 on August 6, 2026. Five more accused, including Manna alias Manivannan, subsequently approached the Principal Sessions Court seeking bail.

The defence counsel, Muthamizh Selvan, submitted that the accused had been in judicial custody for more than two years and that the earlier charge sheet had been quashed. He argued that the CBI had not examined any witness for a considerable period after taking over the probe and that continued incarceration violated the accused’s right to a speedy investigation and trial.

The CBI Special Public Prosecutor opposed the petitions, submitting that the agency was actively investigating the case, including examining and re-examining crucial witnesses and scrutinising electronic records, financial transactions and the roles of untraced co-conspirators. Granting bail at this stage would jeopardise the investigation into the remaining conspiratorial links, the prosecutor submitted.

Allowing the bail petitions, Principal Sessions Judge B. Karthikyan observed that the CBI did not appear to have examined even a single witness during the month preceding the hearing. The judge noted that the earlier investigation had recorded the statements of 237 witnesses and said the extent of the material now before the CBI indicated the enormity of the task facing the agency.

“It does not appear that investigation would be completed in a short time,” the judge observed. The judge also noted that the accused had already spent more than two years in custody and that the investigation remained at the FIR stage after the earlier final report was quashed.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.