Haven't changed a comma, EC sources clarify after SC's Form 6 remark

Direct Source Verification: This story is aggregated from India Today (indiatoday.in). Full reporting rights and copyright belong to the primary publisher.
Hours after Chief Justice of India Surya Kant observed during a hearing on a petition seeking the prosecution of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar that the Supreme Court had not approved any modified Form 6, sources within the central poll body reiterated its offici...

Hours after Chief Justice of India Surya Kant observed during a hearing on a petition seeking the prosecution of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar that the Supreme Court had not approved any modified Form 6, sources within the central poll body reiterated its official stance, saying that it had not changed even a comma or full stop in the original Form 6.

The Election Commission has said that an additional page containing a declaration was added to Form 6 during the SIR.

Sources said the protocol for this was formulated during last year's SIR in Bihar and was subsequently challenged in the Supreme Court. After hearing the matter, the EC sources said, the court observed that the protocol falls within the ambit of the constitutional powers vested in the Election Commission.

The sources added that the additional declaration was also part of the protocol.

However, legal experts told India Today that even before adding the declaration, the mandatory consultation process between the government and the Election Commission should have been completed. Any change or additional provision would also have to be notified in the Gazette and placed before Parliament, they said.

The latest clarification from sources within the poll body came after the Opposition targeted the Election Commission on Monday, following CJI Surya Kant's remarks: "Any modified Form 6 has not been approved by us. Let's be clear. When the record is produced, we would like to see who has modified."

In response, Rahul Gandhi accused CEC Gyanesh Kumar of changing Form 6 "illegally and unilaterally," citing an earlier press statement issued by the poll body last month, which said that the Supreme Court had upheld the declaration attached to Form 6.

Earlier on Monday, a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana made the observation while hearing a PIL filed following a recent Indian Express report on alleged irregularities in the Election Commission's decision-making process during the rollout of the SIR.

The report claimed that two of the three Election Commissioners had objected to decisions linked to the Special Intensive Revision, including changes to Form 6 concerning an applicant's ancestry and a link to the previous SIR.

One of the main issues raised in the plea concerns the alteration of Form 6, which is used by people to register as voters. The petition alleged that the requirement to provide ancestral details and a link to the previous SIR was introduced through the poll panel's software without the statutory amendment required under the electoral rules. According to the petition, the two Election Commissioners other than Kumar objected to the change, saying the prescribed form could not be altered without following the statutory procedure.

The plea asked the court to “issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction declaring all decisions, guidelines, directives, and software modifications initiated, approved, or implemented under CEC Gyanesh Kumar without full commission concurrence or contrary to the majority opinion of the Election Commissioners as unconstitutional, ultra vires, and void ab initio.”- Ends

I am Sanjay Shrama Deputy Editor with Aajtak. I am with this prestigious organisation and one of the torch bearer of our motto `Golden standard of journalism` since two decades.. In 2001 I jjoined Aajtak as assistant producer. and since 2003 I am with reporting team.

During this period I have been covering mainly legal beat as Supreme Court, Law ministry, Law commission, Election commission. I have covered Culture ministry as well Tourism and Water resource ministry.. Alongwith legal I am fortunate to do political stories and human interest stories.

Very fond of art culture and Indian classical music. I have been deciple of Padma Vibhushan Pandit Jasraj ji, great doyan of Mewati Gharana. Apart from this great achievement I have covered great congragation of the world The Kumbh mela at all four vanues twice.

Eager to learm languages. I can read and speak many languages apart from Hindi and English I acan read, speak and understand Urdu, Nepali, Rajasthani, Maithili, Bhojpuri and Haryanavi...

Original Source
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/supreme-court-form-6-changes-election-commission-special-intensive-revision-3010148-2026-10-05?utm_source=rss
Visit India Today ↗
SHARE STORY:
𝕏 f in

Related Coverage in Politics