Jeremy Geddert: Conservative leadership elections aren’t conservative enough - National Post
Kerry-Lynne Findlay addresses the annual meeting of the Union of B.C. Municipalities on Sept. 17, 2026, three days before announcing that she was stepping down as leader of the BC Conservatives. Photo by Scott McAlpine / UBCMArticle contentKerry-Lynne Findlay’s impossible tightrope act is over, but the chorus of cheers and jeers now moves from the circus ring of caucus to the raucous stage of stunned party members. The Conservative division of labour, where the party membership hires leaders but the caucus fires them, violates the old conservative maxim that you cannot serve two masters. There is nothing conservative about encouraging two-faced leaders, nor about entrusting the “hiring” part to members in the first place.
Canada’s chief conservative institution is its Westminster system of Responsible Government, the oft-forgottenCanadian triumph of the 1840s. Responsible government rests on two principles that unite the tasks of hiring and firing.
Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Channel Israel will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
First, Cabinet alone is responsible for governing, because it both introduces spending bills and executes them. Unlike a presidential cabinet, Canadian ministers cannot deflect responsibility for bad laws to Congress.
Second, Parliament alone — typically the majority party caucus — is responsible for hiring and firing that governing Cabinet, as Justin Trudeau eventually learned. Unlike the American House majority, Liberal MPs could not deflect responsibility for a bad executive to voters.
Constitutions do not regulate parties outside government. But the Westminster ethos still led opposition parties to adopt the same structure: party caucuses hired and fired their leaders.
If responsibility doesn’t seem distinctively conservative, just ask progressives, who generally bristle at the “smoke-filled rooms” of “party insider” caucuses. The original Progressive party rode a populist western wave of democratization that may have undermined its own leaders, but impelled both major parties to introduce delegated conventions.
Later, the populist Canadian Alliance used a one-member-one-vote method to hire the unready Stockwell Day, which produced a short and stormy tenure for both leader and party. Yet its democratizing wave effectively pressured all Canadian parties to let members hire and fire party leaders.
