Michael Higgins: ICJ risks destroying credibility if it redefines genocide - National Post

This general view shows the logo of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on January 12, 2024. Photo by REMKO DE WAAL /ANP/AFP via Getty ImagesArticle contentA ruling expected shortly by the International Court of Justice in the Hague could pave the way for a host of countries, including Canada, to stand trial for genocide.

In the case of Gambia versus Myanmar the ICJ has been asked to lower the threshold for genocide and if the judges agree it would almost certainly lead to an avalanche of lawfare cases.

The World Court would find itself less concerned with justice than politics.

Indeed, politics is at the heart of the effort to reduce the standard for genocide. A lower standard would make it easier for South Africa to make its case at the ICJ that Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza.

Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Channel Israel will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

But if the ICJ lowers the threshold merely to appease those who wish to punish Israel then it makes a mockery of itself.

Genocide is the “crime of crimes.” Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish lawyer, coined the word in 1944, writing, “By ‘genocide’ we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group.”

Four years later, the Geneva Convention defined genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

To prove genocide involves making the case that there was a “specific intent” to destroy a group, in whole or in part.

Alan Kessel, a Canadian lawyer and diplomat who represented Canada in the early stages of the Myanmar case, said, “Genocide is probably the most difficult issue to prove and it was designed that way. It was particularly made difficult because we do have war crimes, crimes against humanity, but genocide would be the most heinous.”

Canada, along with Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom intervened in the Myanmar case “in order to set out their interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Genocide Convention before the Court,” said a statement from the Canadian government in 2023.