Private Markets At Scale: Why Access Is No Longer Enough

Satish Avhad, Consulting Partner, Global Practice Head, Wealth Management, Wipro Consulting.

getty​Private markets have moved from specialist allocation to the private wealth management growth agenda. Wealth clients want broader exposure to private credit, private equity, infrastructure and real assets. Advisors increasingly need those capabilities to retain relevance with high-net-worth and affluent clients.

Industry forecasts suggest the opportunity is material. Cerulli Associates estimates that U.S. financial advisors have allocated $1.9 trillion to private-market strategies with limited liquidity today, and projects those allocations will reach $3.7 trillion by 2029.

That growth story is real. It is also incomplete.

Many firms still frame the strategic question as access: which funds to offer, which vehicles to distribute, which client segments to include and how quickly to broaden participation. Those questions matter, but they no longer define advantage. As private-market access becomes more available, the product shelf will be easier to copy. The harder capability will be converting that access into durable economics.

The leadership question is no longer whether a firm can offer private markets. It is whether private-market revenue can grow faster than private-market complexity.

That is a margin question. It is also a trust question. Private markets introduce heavier servicing requirements, more complex liquidity management, harder reporting, valuation sensitivity, suitability obligations and greater operational oversight. If those demands are handled through manual workarounds, fragmented data and advisor heroics, growth will carry hidden cost. The firm may gather assets while diluting productivity, increasing risk and pressuring unit economics.

The prevailing belief is simple: Private markets are a distribution opportunity. Expand the menu, simplify the entry point, educate advisors and growth will follow.

That belief captures only the first half of the problem. Access may unlock client demand, but it does not determine whether growth is profitable, controllable or repeatable. A broader product shelf can just as easily create fragmented processes, inconsistent client experiences, duplicated controls and higher servicing costs.

State Street’s “Private Markets Study 2026” points to the same shift. As individual-investor participation expands, firms are investing in operating models, data, technology and platform capabilities to manage liquidity, compliance, reporting and servicing demands. The study frames this as a new operating reality, where access is expanding, but so is complexity.

The contrarian view is therefore direct. Private markets will not reward the firms with the widest access. They will reward the firms with the best operating system for controlled scale.

Controlled scale means more than digitizing forms or adding another platform. It means designing an end-to-end model that connects client eligibility, proposal generation, subscription workflows, capital calls, liquidity windows, reporting, tax documents, advisor support, risk controls and management information. The economics improve only when those activities work as a coordinated system.

The economic model is straightforward. Private markets can expand wallet share, deepen relationships, improve retention and strengthen revenue mix. But each dollar of revenue must be weighed against the cost to originate, explain, onboard, service, monitor and govern the allocation.

Without a scalable model, firms face three forms of margin leakage.

First, advisor capacity erodes. Advisors spend more time explaining product mechanics, coordinating documents, chasing status updates and handling post-investment questions. That time comes out of prospecting, planning and relationship expansion.

Second, operational cost rises. Private-market lifecycle events do not behave like traditional liquid products. Capital calls, distributions, valuation updates, subscription documents, liquidity gates, tax documents and reporting cycles create new handoffs across front office, operations, legal, compliance, tax, data and technology.

Third, control risk increases. Broader participation brings greater scrutiny around suitability, disclosure, valuation transparency, liquidity risk and investor protection. Governance cannot be treated as an after-the-fact compliance layer. It becomes part of the client promise.

Growth that requires proportional increases in manual effort is not scale. It is a higher-cost operating model with better branding.

This is where the strategic conversation becomes a transformation conversation. Wealth firms should assess which parts of the private-market lifecycle are standardized, automated, governed, measured and owned. They should identify where growth breaks the model: advisor capacity, onboarding turnaround, reporting accuracy, liquidity oversight, compliance review, data quality or cost-to-serve.

Technology matters, but it is not the strategy. Platforms can help connect access, portfolio management, data, reporting and lifecycle workflows. AI can help advisors identify suitable clients, model portfolio implications, summarize fund materials, forecast liquidity needs and surface next-best actions. But these capabilities only create value when they are embedded into advisor workflows and governed by clear business ownership.

Private markets challenge the long-standing assumption in wealth management that governance sits behind the business as a defensive control function. In the next phase of private-market growth, governance becomes client-facing.​

Clients need confidence that allocations are suitable, liquidity limitations are understood, valuations are transparent, documentation is complete and lifecycle events are handled reliably. Advisors need confidence that the firm’s operating model will support the recommendation after the sale. Regulators need confidence that broader access is matched by stronger controls.​

That makes trust an operating outcome. It is created through transparent reporting, disciplined suitability processes, valuation governance, liquidity oversight, clear disclosures and audit-ready control evidence. In private markets, the quality of the operating model increasingly shapes the quality of the client relationship.​

That formula is not meant to be a spreadsheet shortcut. It is a leadership discipline. It forces wealth firms to evaluate private markets as a growth-quality question, not just a product-access question.

Private markets will remain a growth opportunity, but the firms that will prove most successful will not define success by how much access they provide. They will define it by how efficiently, safely and repeatedly they can convert access into client value and strong economics.

Access gets your foot in the door. Controlled scale determines who creates value.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?