Warren Mirko: Not helpful for B.C. Indigenous leader to declare 'war' on common sense policies - National Post

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs Photo by Scott McAlpine /UBCMArticle contentAs the incoming B.C. Conservative government prepares to deliver on its promise to repeal the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, stated this week that doing so would be a “declaration of war.”

After an election in which competing positions were openly debated and voters knew what was at stake, any talk of war is wholly unnecessary and provocative. Concerns over DRIPA did not suddenly emerge with the selection of a new government. Even outgoing premier David Eby acknowledged the serious legal uncertainty it created, proposing amending or even suspending the legislation before retreating in the face of opposition from First Nations leaders and his own caucus.

Premier-elect Lorne Doerkson was unambiguous throughout the election campaign that repealing DRIPA was a top priority, while also reaffirming that he is “completely committed to working with First Nations.”

Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Channel Israel will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Phillip can oppose repeal, but suggesting that British Columbia could become a battleground over a legislative decision he opposes only serves to stifle public debate. B.C. Green Leader Emily Lowan recently reinforced this narrative by linking Conservative efforts to repeal DRIPA with anti-Indigenous racism.

Their approach fosters the mistaken impression that DRIPA is somehow necessary to protect Aboriginal rights. It isn’t. Opposition to the legislation should not be conflated with opposition to Aboriginal rights.

As Aboriginal law expert Tom Isaac recently explained on CBC’s “B.C. Today,” Aboriginal rights do not flow from the declaration. They are recognized and protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, regardless of whether DRIPA remains in force. Isaac has also described Canada’s legal framework as the world’s leading system for protecting Indigenous rights against unilateral government action.

Several Indigenous leaders have openly challenged the confrontational rhetoric surrounding DRIPA and questioned whether it reflects the views of their communities.